<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hubcapgt musclecar blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog</link>
	<description>A place to talk about muscle cars and street rods.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:42:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 1968 Dodge Dart GTS by ben</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/10/23/1968-dodge-dart-gts/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/10/23/1968-dodge-dart-gts/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>this is a nice ass car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a nice ass car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Plymouth Road Runner by HubcapGT Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/08/15/1970-plymouth-road-runner/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>HubcapGT Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/08/15/1970-plymouth-road-runner/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thank you. you are correct. I will edit the orginal post with the correct information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. you are correct. I will edit the orginal post with the correct information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Plymouth Road Runner by Bob</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/08/15/1970-plymouth-road-runner/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/08/15/1970-plymouth-road-runner/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I ordered a &#039;70 RR in fall of &#039;69.  Base engine was the 335 HP 383.  No 2-barrell version (290 HP) available.  Also, the 4-barrel 440 was not avaiable in the RR (at least not from the factory).  I wanted the 4-bbl 440 but since it wasn&#039;t on the options list, went w/the 6-bbl 440.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered a &#8216;70 RR in fall of &#8216;69.  Base engine was the 335 HP 383.  No 2-barrell version (290 HP) available.  Also, the 4-barrel 440 was not avaiable in the RR (at least not from the factory).  I wanted the 4-bbl 440 but since it wasn&#8217;t on the options list, went w/the 6-bbl 440.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Car by tIM</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/06/20/my-car/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>tIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/06/20/my-car/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Neat car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Motors history of muscle cars. by DodgeRT</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/07/09/general-motors-history-of-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>DodgeRT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/07/09/general-motors-history-of-muscle-cars/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>You are more than correct. In fact when you look at todays cars , they all look alike. Igave up years ago trying to know which is which. There is no difference between a $60,000 car and a $10,000 car.  And you certainly have no idea what kind of power is under the hood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are more than correct. In fact when you look at todays cars , they all look alike. Igave up years ago trying to know which is which. There is no difference between a $60,000 car and a $10,000 car.  And you certainly have no idea what kind of power is under the hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Motors history of muscle cars. by dee</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/07/09/general-motors-history-of-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/07/09/general-motors-history-of-muscle-cars/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>when muscle car were faded out we lost the fun a car had to offer, and the character a car offerd in it looks. Now what do you see when you look at the cars of today you see oh thats nice and good  gas milage, never WOW LOOK AT THAT any more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when muscle car were faded out we lost the fun a car had to offer, and the character a car offerd in it looks. Now what do you see when you look at the cars of today you see oh thats nice and good  gas milage, never WOW LOOK AT THAT any more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1968 AMX 390 by GT Webnaster</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/05/26/1968-amx-390/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>GT Webnaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/05/26/1968-amx-390/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I had 4 59, 60, 62 and a 63.
The factory said they won’t build the 62. But after a couple of months the dealer called and said it was in. 327 automatic. The mechanics wanted to know what the heck I got and how. For its time it was really fast. Dragging one day I accidentally pushed the reverse button instead of second. Trashed the rear end  Great car , had a lot of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had 4 59, 60, 62 and a 63.<br />
The factory said they won’t build the 62. But after a couple of months the dealer called and said it was in. 327 automatic. The mechanics wanted to know what the heck I got and how. For its time it was really fast. Dragging one day I accidentally pushed the reverse button instead of second. Trashed the rear end  Great car , had a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1968 AMX 390 by Tom</title>
		<link>http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/05/26/1968-amx-390/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hubcapgt.com/musclecarblog/2007/05/26/1968-amx-390/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I had a 67 AMX painted this color 390 with an automatic. Used lots of gas but did&#039;nt really matter at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 67 AMX painted this color 390 with an automatic. Used lots of gas but did&#8217;nt really matter at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

